JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)October 19, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Juan Carlos Martinez

✓
Topic · hard data
Solicitud De Aclaración De La Sentencia T-365/06 Contra La Secretaria De Transito Y Transporte De Bogota. Rechazada Por Extemporanea.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Corte Constitucional
  • Incompetencia para absolver consultas que formulen los ciudadanos
  • Fallos que dicte en ejercicio del control jurisdiccional hacen tránsito a cosa juzgada constitucional
  • Incompetencia para aclaración de sentencias
Solicitud De Aclaración De Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Improcedencia por extemporaneidad por presentación fuera del término de ejecutoria de la sentencia T-365 de 2006
  • Improcedencia
Aclaracion Sentencia De La Corte Constitucional
  • Procedencia por presentación dentro del término de ejecutoria y a petición de parte o de oficio
4 topics · 7 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. RECHAZAR por extemporánea la solicitud de aclaración presentada por Juan Carlos Martínez respecto de la sentencia 365 del once (11) de mayo de dos mil seis 2006 proferida por la Sala Tercera de Revisión.
  2. Contra esta providencia no procede recurso alguno.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.